Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the United States Security and Exchange Commission, has built up a reputation of being anti-crypto throughout his tenure as the SEC boss. However, while most of the crypto community has been quiet regarding Gensler’s crypto stance, two US reps seem to have had enough and issued an ultimatum to the SEC chair.
In a September 17 letter to Gary Gensler, US Representative Tom Emmer and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry expressed their concerns over the SEC's assertions about airdrops over the last two years.
The future of the peer-to-peer digital economy cannot be left to the authoritarian whims of @GaryGensler.
— Tom Emmer (@GOPMajorityWhip) September 17, 2024
Today, @PatrickMcHenry and I are requesting answers from the SEC on their position that airdrops are securities transactions. pic.twitter.com/UFm7ymdEaj
In September 2022, the SEC sued Hydrogen Technology Corporation and its former CEO, accusing them of manipulating the “crypto-asset securities” market.
Hydrogen Technology Corporation had minted over 11 billion Hydro tokens in a fundraising effort and distributed them as airdrops. However, in its case against the firm, the SEC called these airdrops “unregistered offers and sales of their securities.”
In another case involving Justin Sun and some other firms, the SEC, in March 2023, accused these firms of offering and selling BitTorrent (BTT) in “unregistered monthly airdrops to investors.”
🚨NEW: @SECGov Chairman @GaryGensler is under investigation by top Republican lawmakers @Jim_Jordan, @PatrickMcHenry and @JamesComer for engaging in suspected political favoritism in his hiring practices.
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) September 12, 2024
Full letter: pic.twitter.com/1IzKrmb497
In their letter to the SEC, Representatives Emmer and McHenry referred to these cases as proof of the SEC’s antagonistic approach to airdrops. They also expressed their fear of the SEC preventing the tech from achieving decentralization to its full potential through what they referred to as:
... misapplication of the securities of the securities laws.
The two reps have now given Gary Gensler an ultimatum of September 30 to answer five questions related to crypto airdrops. One of those questions includes “how crypto given away for free” can be placed under the Howey test, and another one is how exactly the SEC distinguishes airdrops from other reward schemes like credit card points.
Gary Gensler is also supposed to explain how classifying airdropped tokens as securities would impact on-chain apps, economic growth, and tax revenue and whether the SEC had assessed the market impact of classifying cryptos as securities.
I love a good Gensler ribbing as much as the next guy but the SEC did basically clarify its (ultra aggro) position on token airdrops in the Tomahawk Exploration case. And the position is consistent with the free stock cases of the 90s. We may *disagree* that the position is… pic.twitter.com/Pru3gztQte
— _gabrielShapir0 (@lex_node) September 17, 2024
Both Reps publicly criticized the SEC, saying that prohibiting Americans from participating in airdrops prevents American crypto users from fully realizing the benefits of blockchain tech.
However, while Emmer and McHenry’s dissatisfaction with the SEC is the most recent, it is not the only one. This is the second time in a week that Republican reps have called out Gensler over crypto.
On September 10, several Republican lawmakers also questioned Gensler, a Democrat himself, on the crypto issue. They asked whether Gensler’s political affiliation may influence who he hires at the SEC. They accused the SEC of hiring individuals from left-leaning organizations and placing them in senior roles at the agency.
The SEC has not responded to any of the recent questions. Still, if the previous hiring allegations are true, the SEC would be violating the Civil Service Reform Act, which may put Gensler in serious hot water.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d1f8/5d1f84aee3f9fb8ae3a2a438a72c9d4e8eb37e73" alt="hodl-post-image"
Disclaimer: All materials on this site are for informational purposes only. None of the material should be interpreted as investment advice. Please note that despite the nature of much of the material created and hosted on this website, HODL FM is not a financial reference resource and the opinions of authors and other contributors are their own and should not be taken as financial advice. If you require advice of this sort, HODL FM strongly recommends contacting a qualified industry professional.