In a turn of events that can only be described as a slap in the face for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ripple Labs emerged victorious on July 13 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Judge Analisa Torres, perhaps with a twinkle in her eye, ruled that Ripple’s XRP token is not a security, leaving the SEC’s case as deflated as a punctured beach ball.

SEC’s Pursuit of Ripple: A Case of Misguided Definitions

The SEC, under the watchful eye of Gerry Gensler, had been doggedly pursuing Ripple Labs since 2020, insisting that XRP was a security. Their argument was akin to calling a dog a cat and expecting it to meow. But Judge Torres, in her wisdom, saw through the SEC’s thinly veiled attempt to redefine the crypto landscape.


Ripple’s Triumph: Summary Judgment in Favor of Ripple Labs

The court documents from that fateful day read like a tragicomedy for the SEC. “The defendants’ plea for summary judgment is APPROVED for the Programmatic Sales, the Other Distributions, and sales by Larsen and Garlinghouse, and REJECTED for the Institutional Sales.” One can almost hear the collective sigh of relief from Ripple Labs and the stifled giggles from the crypto community.

Read more: Power Drama at the SEC, Bank of China’s Crypto Leap, Bitcoin Football, and CPI Volatility

The Ripple Verdict

The Ripple verdict marks a pivotal moment in the crypto sphere, asserting that a token and an investment contract are not one and the same. It highlights the urgent need for precise, well-thought-out regulations that differentiate between the two. This decision could pave the way for more balanced and comprehensive crypto laws. The time is ripe to enshrine this principle in our legal framework.

XRP Price Surge: Market Reaction to the Court’s Decision

In the wake of the news, the XRP token, perhaps feeling a bit giddy, leaped from $0.45 to $0.61 in a matter of minutes. That’s a jump of over 25%, a figure that surely had the SEC’s heads spinning faster than a dreidel at Hanukkah.

Read more: The Sec vs Ethereum rodeo; security edition

The SEC vs. Ripple: A Rollercoaster Case with Dramatic Twists

The SEC’s crusade against Ripple began in December 2020, when they accused Ripple and its top executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen, of peddling an unregistered security. The case has been a rollercoaster ride of dramatic revelations, including the unveiling of the “Hinman Documents” and Garlinghouse’s steadfast refusal to bow to the SEC’s accusations.


Lessons Learned: Not Every Token is a Security

The court’s decision not only sent XRP’s value skyrocketing but also sparked a wave of jubilation across the crypto community. One can only imagine the SEC, licking its wounds, as the crypto world celebrates this David versus Goliath victory. Here’s to hoping they’ve learned their lesson: not every token is a security, no matter how hard you squint.

DisclaimerAll materials on this site are for informational purposes only. None of the material should be interpreted as investment advice.Please note that despite the nature of much of the material created and hosted on this website, HODL FM is not a financial reference resource and the opinions of authors and other contributors are their own and should not be taken as financial advice. If you require advice of this sort, HODL FM strongly recommends contacting a qualified industry professional.